ci / ci (pull_request) Canceled after 2m21s
Mirrors ShadowsOverWestgate/sow-topdata@8c5f4d8 into this repo's copy of the shared agent docs. nixpkgs now ships tea 0.15.1, so `tea issues edit --add-labels` applies `Kind/*` and the rest of the org set. The 0.14 ceiling stays documented as history for anyone on a pinned older tea. Two things outlived the bump. `tea api` cannot write at all — any `--method POST`/`PATCH` returns `{"message":"token is required"}`, while GETs succeed anonymously because these repos are public. Both files prescribed a `tea api` labels endpoint for labelling an existing issue; that recipe has never worked. It now points at `tea issues edit`. The read-back rule stays, with its reasoning corrected. The note had grown a claim that `tea issues ls` returns stale labels for several seconds after a successful edit, and warned against concluding failure from an immediate read. That was the 0.14 silent no-op misread as replication lag — the read-back was accurate both before and after the bump, and waiting it out would convert a real failure into an assumed success. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
108 lines
6.5 KiB
Markdown
108 lines
6.5 KiB
Markdown
# Issue tracker: Gitea (via tea)
|
|
|
|
Issues for this repo live in Gitea at `git.westgate.pw`, repo
|
|
`ShadowsOverWestgate/sow-tools`. Use the `tea` CLI for all operations —
|
|
`gh` does not work here. For anything `tea` lacks a subcommand for, use
|
|
`tea api <endpoint>` (Gitea's API mirrors GitHub's closely).
|
|
|
|
Authenticate with your own `tea` login (`tea login add`); never commit tokens
|
|
or tea config into this repo. Note Gitea blocks self-review, so approving a PR
|
|
needs a different account than the one that opened it.
|
|
|
|
## Where work lives
|
|
|
|
Markdown in this repo is **reference, law, or an ADR — nothing else**
|
|
(`sow-codebase` ADR-0001). Four homes, no overlap:
|
|
|
|
- **Live work** → wayfinder maps + Gitea issues. Closeable, assignable,
|
|
queryable. Never a markdown file.
|
|
- **Settled decisions** → ADR files in `docs/adr/`. Immutable, findable, never
|
|
closed, never edited — only superseded by a later ADR pointing back. When an
|
|
issue ends in a durable decision, write the ADR, then close the issue
|
|
pointing at it. Decisions spanning repos go to `sow-platform/docs/adr/`.
|
|
- **Standing law** → `DOCTRINE.md`, `AGENTS.md`, `CONTEXT.md`. Rules that are
|
|
always true and vocabulary everyone shares — not the record of one decision.
|
|
- **Current-state reference** → docs describing what the code does now, kept
|
|
honest by review touching them.
|
|
|
|
Anything else — implementation plans, design specs, concepts, handoffs,
|
|
progress trackers, scratch — is **process**. It does not live in this repo. It
|
|
lives in a Gitea issue or a wayfinder map, where it can be assigned, closed,
|
|
and superseded. Small tasks need no written plan at all.
|
|
|
|
Deleting a process doc is not destroying history — `git log -- <path>` recovers
|
|
it. But *unfinished intent* (a design never built, an open question still
|
|
wanted) is live, not history: harvest it to a Gitea issue before deleting.
|
|
|
|
`sow-docs` is deprecated and read-only. Never add to it, never send work there.
|
|
|
|
## Which repo gets the issue
|
|
|
|
Issues follow ownership. File the issue in the repo that **owns the work** —
|
|
see the Repo/Owns/Produces table in the workspace root `AGENTS.md`. Standing
|
|
in one repo is not a reason to file there.
|
|
|
|
If work spans repos, file it in the repo that owns the *outcome* and reference
|
|
the others from it. A wrong-repo issue is a routing bug, not a filing
|
|
preference — move it.
|
|
|
|
## Conventions
|
|
|
|
- **Create an issue**: `tea issues create --title "..." --description "..."`
|
|
- **Read an issue**: `tea issues <number>` and
|
|
`tea api repos/ShadowsOverWestgate/sow-tools/issues/<number>/comments` for comments.
|
|
- **List issues**: `tea issues list --state open` (add `--labels ...` to filter).
|
|
- **Comment**: `tea comment <number> "..." </dev/null`
|
|
Always redirect stdin. `tea` reads stdin to EOF and appends it to the body,
|
|
so any non-interactive shell (every agent) hangs forever without
|
|
`</dev/null`. Same trap on `tea issues create --description` and
|
|
`tea pr create`.
|
|
- **Apply / remove labels**: `tea issues edit <number> --add-labels "Kind/Bug"`
|
|
(and `--remove-labels`). This handles org-level labels (`Kind/*`,
|
|
`Priority/*`, `Reviewed/*`, `Status/*`) from tea 0.15 onwards. On 0.14 it did
|
|
not: name resolution searched only this repo's own label set, so an org label
|
|
matched nothing and the command exited 0, printed the issue, and changed
|
|
nothing. Upstream fixed it in v0.15 (`modules/task/labels.go` also queries
|
|
`ListOrgLabels`). Note `tea labels` lists repo labels only and will not show
|
|
you the org set — `tea api orgs/ShadowsOverWestgate/labels` does.
|
|
- **`tea api` can read but not write.** Writing methods (`--method POST`,
|
|
`PATCH`, ...) return `{"message":"token is required"}`. GETs against these
|
|
public repos succeed anonymously, which makes the gap easy to miss: reads
|
|
work, writes do not. Use the `tea issues` / `tea pr` subcommands for anything
|
|
that changes state.
|
|
- **Verify every label change by re-reading it.** A label command exiting 0 is
|
|
not evidence it applied — that is exactly how the 0.14 silent no-op above hid
|
|
for so long, and assuming otherwise has already cost one investigation
|
|
several wrong turns. Read the resulting set back with
|
|
`tea api repos/ShadowsOverWestgate/sow-tools/issues/<number>` and check its
|
|
`labels` field, or `tea issues ls -o json`. The read-back reflects the write
|
|
immediately; if it comes back empty, the write genuinely failed. Do not
|
|
explain an empty read-back away as replication lag.
|
|
- **Close**: `tea issues close <number>`
|
|
|
|
`tea` infers the repo from the git remote when run inside the clone.
|
|
Gitea shares one number space across issues and PRs.
|
|
|
|
## Pull requests as a triage surface
|
|
|
|
**PRs as a request surface: no.**
|
|
|
|
## When a skill says "publish to the issue tracker"
|
|
|
|
Create a Gitea issue with `tea issues create`.
|
|
|
|
## When a skill says "fetch the relevant ticket"
|
|
|
|
Run `tea issues <number>` plus the comments API call above.
|
|
|
|
## Wayfinding operations
|
|
|
|
Used by `/wayfinder`. The **map** is a single issue with **child** issues as tickets.
|
|
|
|
- **Map**: a single issue labelled `wayfinder:map`, holding the Notes / Decisions-so-far / Fog body. `tea issues create --title "..." --description "..." --labels wayfinder:map`.
|
|
- **Child ticket**: this Gitea instance (v1.27) has no native sub-issue hierarchy, so a child issue carries `Part of #<map>` at the top of its description, and is also added to a task list in the map body. Labels: `wayfinder:<type>` (`research`/`prototype`/`grilling`/`task`). Once claimed, the ticket is assigned to the driving dev.
|
|
- **Blocking**: Gitea's **native dependencies API** — the canonical, UI-visible representation (shows as "Depends on" / "Blocks" on the issue page). Add an edge with `tea api -X POST repos/ShadowsOverWestgate/sow-tools/issues/<child>/dependencies -f owner=ShadowsOverWestgate -f repo=sow-tools -F index=<blocker>`, where `<blocker>` is the blocker's issue **index** (its `#number` — Gitea's dependency API takes the index directly, unlike GitHub's numeric database id). Check status with `tea api repos/ShadowsOverWestgate/sow-tools/issues/<child>/dependencies` (GET) — a ticket is unblocked when every returned issue's `state` is `closed`.
|
|
- **Frontier query**: list the map's open children (`tea issues list --state open`, keep the ones whose description contains `Part of #<map>`), drop any with an open dependency (per the GET above) or an assignee; first in map order wins.
|
|
- **Claim**: `tea issues edit <n> --add-assignees <username>` — the session's first write.
|
|
- **Resolve**: `tea comment <n> "<answer>" </dev/null`, then `tea issues close <n>`, then append a context pointer (gist + link) to the map's Decisions-so-far.
|